Cash runway · For founders who would rather know

Ducks in a row.
Cash above the line.

Most companies do not fail because the founder was wrong about cashflow. They fail because something landed in a month nobody had looked at. Waterline models cash runway by tracking payroll, purchase orders, projects, drawdowns and cost share on the month cash actually moves, and shows the month you cross the waterline.

Create your company · Free 14-day trial · Find your Waterline

Scenarios

The part that replaces six copies of a spreadsheet.

Every founder has a folder with plan-v3-FINAL-actually.xlsx in it. The reason is not disorganisation — a spreadsheet has no way to hold two versions of the truth at once.

DashboardProjectsPayrollScenarios
Delay two hires to Q3 +1.4 mosaved
Extend period 2 by six months +0.9 mosaved
Bridge $200k in December +2.1 mosaved
Series A slips to June −1.9 mosaved
Live plan 5.6 mo

Each figure is that change applied to the whole model. Keep one, discard it, or hand it to somebody.

Yours until you share it

Model privately

A scenario changes nothing until you apply it. Your co-founder is not watching you model redundancies in real time.

Against the whole model

Not a back-of-envelope

Extending a period moves the spend, the billing, your share’s deadline and every milestone that depended on them. You see all of it, not the one number you thought to check.

Offered, not imposed

Hand it to somebody

Your fractional CFO builds a scenario in your model and offers it. You accept or decline. Advice arrives as a thing you can run rather than a paragraph in an email.

Knowing a month breaks is half of it. The other half is finding out, in ninety seconds, which of the three things you could do about it actually helps.

The loop

See it, test it, decide.

01It stays true

Connected to your books. Months you have closed use actuals; the projection starts where the ledger stops. A warning from a stale model is worse than none.

02It says what breaks

Uncovered commitments, milestones after the cash, a runway resting on money nobody promised. Two alerts at most, worst first.

03You try the fix

Build the change as a scenario, see what it does to the whole model, apply it or throw it away. The live plan does not move until you say so.

When somebody else is paying for part of the work

Funded work has mechanics. Most runway tools have never met them.

A federal award, a prime contract you sit under, a joint venture where each partner carries a share, a project split across three funders with three different rules. They look like different arrangements and they behave like one: you spend first, you bill on somebody else's rhythm, you wait, and part of the cost never gets reimbursed at all.

Every other runway tool assumes money lands when somebody decides to send it. Waterline assumes it lands when the paperwork says it does.

The wait

You spend first, then you invoice, then you wait

The weeks between sending an invoice and the money landing are where a fully funded organization runs out of cash. Whether the payer is an agency, a prime, or a JV partner with their own approval chain, the arithmetic is the same. Set it once per arrangement.

Your share

The part that is never reimbursed

Cost share on an award. Your contribution to a joint venture. The unfunded portion of a split-funded project. Different words, one behaviour: it accrues against what you bill, it has a deadline, and it is money you have promised somebody and have to find.

When the period moves

More time rarely means more money

A no-cost extension, a contract mod, a JV milestone that slips a quarter. The budget spreads thinner, your share's deadline moves with it, and payment in arrears arrives later — the half people forget.

However you bill

Monthly, in arrears, or against milestones

Each rhythm changes when the money comes in and when your share falls due. Waterline schedules both on the rhythm you actually bill, not on a calendar it invented.

Your share, owed · two periods

owed0 P1 closeP2 close

It rises with what you bill, not with the calendar. The dashed rules are the moments somebody checks it.

Also modelled Indirect and negotiated rates · restricted funds that stay restricted · drawdown schedules · milestone billing · pass-through to subrecipients · multiple funders on one project, each with their own period and rules.

And if you work with federal awards SF-424A imports and exports — categories, periods and rates read straight in, and a budget that goes back out in the shape the agency expects. Nobody retypes anything.

If none of your money arrives that way, ignore all of it — the rest of the product does not depend on it. If some of it does, this is the only runway tool that has heard of any of this.

What it catches

Five states your plan can be in while the dashboard looks fine.

Signed, not paid

A commitment does not move your runway

A purchase order payable in month nine changes nothing about when the cash runs out. It still commits you. Both numbers, never confused.

Your share, after the money

A contribution you cannot make

An unreimbursed share falling due after your cash runs out is money you have promised a funder, a prime or a partner and do not have. It is invisible in every budget document you own.

Recovery

Cash that dips and comes back

A projection can go negative in January and recover in March when a reimbursement lands. A company with no cash in January does not reach March.

Pace

Spending faster than the period allows

A project ahead of pace runs out of budget before it runs out of months — and whoever is paying does not cover the overrun. You do.

Dependency

Which layer holds you up

Runway 5.6 months committed, 12.4 with speculative on. That is not a longer runway. It is a dependency with a size.

Order

Milestones after the money

Board dates, certifications and pilot deliveries plotted against the balance that has to last until them.

A word about alerts

Deliberately quiet.

Software that lists everything that could go wrong becomes unreadable in a week, which leaves you worse off than before you installed it. At most two alerts per screen, worst first, each naming the thing to look at rather than the feeling to have.

The measure of this working is not how much it tells you. It is that when it does say something, you go and look — and then you have somewhere to go.

Find the month that breaks. Then find out what fixes it.